In gym class the other day:
- So, where are you from.
- (Oh great, just one day, please god, just one day where I don't get asked that question, OK, just say it and be done, no need to elaborate, one happy catch all answer - he'll get the hint)
India.
- Where in India?
- (Is it too much to ask?) All over, really, born in Madras (yeah, yeah, Chennai), grew up in Delhi, Bombay, lots of family based in Bombay, but I live here. (Why am I telling you this, why do I care what you think of where I'm from. Just be satisfied with my vague waffling and drop it).
- Oh (long silence, good, managed to end that rather quickly)
No, but, where are you Actually from.
(Is he serious????)
- I told you already. (Oh, I may have come of sounding a bit brusque there. I don't care. Will you please stop fucking caring where people are from - oh why am I trying to take on the stupid and futile task of educating this guy into dropping the geographic label. Oh shit, he got that I was brusque. Now he's shuffling his feet... act casual, relax, lets just enjoy class. Its all like, cool, dude, totally chill.)
Shall we go warm up?
-Oh, yeah. Cool (he lifts his t-shirt to check out his abs in the mirror).
- (SIGH)
This is The Dreaded Question. It is the acid test about whether a city is truly cosmopolitan or not.
I should make the distinction that exists in my head clear before I proceed. I'm thinking global cosmopolitanism. Not Desi cosmopolitan. Mumbai in my mind, is a very Desi cosmopolitan city, with all its Matoshri housing societies where Gujarati lives next to Bawa underneath Bengali two doors down from the Sikh one house down from the Goan who can look right into the window of the Tamilian (see this well written farce Black with Equal for a good example of this, its one of the better plays I've seen since I got back to India, but that's not saying much). However, I don't think its globally cosmopolitan. Though its a good start that the younglings come in droves from other such metropolis's like Bangalore and Delhi. I just wish they were coming in from all over the world instead. Because then, I think, in time, all of us would start to drop the age old Indian (I really think that this is one of those moments where I can use the catch all term 'Indian') culture of needing to know where the other person is from.
The reason I loved New York (though it being part of the US is truly regrettable these days), and the reason I loved London (See previous parenthesis, replace US with England), is that everyone was from somewhere else. So no one cared about identity through geographic location. The fact that you were there, in those cities, and able to have a good conversation with the person next to you was enough to be interested, or to want to know more about you as a person, in that moment, in the here and now. There was no mental labelling going on based on your geographic, cultural, identity (I know there's always some kind of labelling, just with finer brushes, not with the big fat paintbrush). It always took a long while for people to get around to that question "So where are you from?", at least 10 or 15 minutes into the conversation after they've already got a developed sense of who you - as an individual - are, and whether they click with you or not. Hell, there was a good chance that it would never be asked and when it finally came into the conversation by accident, it would be this cool surprise:
- Oh really, wow - I've never been there, but always wanted to go.
Or some such type of positive re-enforcement.
It is the single feature of Mumbai social life, that reminds me of the distinction between our Desi cosmopolitanism and a more global one. TDQ from now because it will appear in later entries if it doesn't stop - "Oh, I shot someone today - he TDQ'd me". TDQ is asked to me on a daily basis in Mumbai, and its made no easier by the fact that they can't place the slight accent or bawa look. The accent-odd look combo seems to throw people a bit. They feel distinctly uncomfortable if they can't place me. If I chose not to answer it, its as if I've left them void of an essential piece of the puzzle without which there is absolutely no chance of being able to engage or relate to me. Its like (ok, geek moment coming up here) there's no TCP/IP handshake so how the hell can we start to browse each others webpages! (One avatar, a long time ago, was that of IT person. Hey, new idea! If lied and told people I did IT maybe they would believe me the first time I said I'm from India, well of course you are, you do IT!).
So. Now, I'm trying to come up with ways of dealing with TDQ.
- Ignore it. Except we already established that by doing that there is no hope of continuing any sort of conversation. An especially bad ploy if the girl to your left is good looking, and you'd like her to do more than just talk to you. Conversation feels like such a waste of time in those cases. But what to do, one step at a time.
- Answer it with a vague but dismissive generalisation. India. (But you saw what happened there).
- Answer it with a vague but honest generalisation.
- Well, a lot of places actually.
Then gird your loins as you have to embark on a thorough and complete elaboration. Well, there goes 20 minutes of not talking to the cute girl to my left while I answer this jackass to my right.
- Be cocky.
-I'm not going to answer it. Because I believe it doesn't matter in the long run. Do you have it in you to deal with that?
That would be good, except I believe either 1. will happen, or questioner will decide they're going to clamp to the issue like a Rottweiler and find out. Ah, the innate and ubiquitous desi character trait of curiosity. So 20 minutes of , no tell me naaa , and then the 20 minutes of 3. Oh, and no matter how cute she is, if she goes, "No tell me naaaa..."
- Share your thoughts on TDQ. Like what I've done here. But then, I think the person will take it personally.
- You mean, I generalise? I do not label people! Do you label people? You're judging me right now aren't you.
(There goes any chance of a second date). - Check if this is a conversation filler.
- Do you really give a damn, do you really care to know?
But then, to prove that they're not shallow conversationalists, they'll insist they do, and then of course you're back at 3. - Turn it into a pickup line.
- I'm from Mars (Totally straight faced).
- Your from Venus right.
On second thoughts, that'll only work on the "No tell me naaa" chick.
- Be rude.
- Ask your mom. She knows.
(Ok, maybe not that rude).
- Shoot them. Point blank. If I want, first do an evangelical Samuel L. Jackson type of sermon about TDQ (see 5.) and then take out my big fat gun and shoot them. Oh why bother, just shoot them without the sermon.
(Ok, you know how the threat of going to jail outweighs the satisfaction of committing a gross heinous act such as that of murder in the first degree? Enough TDQ's, and this may be the 1,00,000 questioners lucky prize). - Shoot myself.
- You happy now? See what you made me do! (Gasp and die dramatically in the hope that the point is made, someone makes a movie on the issue, dedicates it to my memory and everyone remembers to not ask TDQ because its uber-uncool).
- Ask them the same question right back. Except, here's whats liable to happen.
- No I asked you first.
- Doesn't matter who asked first.
- I asked you first, you answer.
- No you answer.
- No you.
- You.
- You!
(Proceed to feel like you're in a conversation where both of you are once again 13 years old. See other post on Regression).
One day,
I'll come up with the right answer to this one. I really honestly don't know what it is yet, until then, please, just ask me about how my day went, or find ... something else to start the conversation with.